From: ILPI Support <info**At_Symbol_Here**ILPI.COM>
Subject: Re: [DCHAS-L] Color-blindness as a lab safety concern
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:13:56 -0500
Reply-To: ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety <DCHAS-L**At_Symbol_Here**PRINCETON.EDU>
Message-ID: C5A93D14-4C12-423F-8357-1AA103B60A23**At_Symbol_Here**ilpi.com
In-Reply-To
The classic example (and, no doubt, Monona has an entire filing cabinet devoted to this topic) is Automobile Workers v Johnson Controls, which held that a lead-acid battery manufacturer was not allowed to prohibit women of child-bearing age from working on the assembly lines because of fetotoxicity of lead: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/499/187.html
On Feb 13, 2017, at 1:44 PM, Stuart, Ralph <ralph.stuart**At_Symbol_Here**KEENE.EDU> wrote:I'm sorry, but if you have bowed legs lady, ballet is not for you. Tone deaf? Put down that Butterfly score.
I can understand this point, but I have seen many ADA-inspired accommodations for people with specific difficulties make a hazardous situation easier and safety for everyone. I've also seen the opposite occur. A balanced approach to specific cases is needed, but is not always inevitable.
- Ralph
Ralph Stuart, CIH, CCHO
Environmental Safety Manager
Keene State College
603 358-2859
ralph.stuart**At_Symbol_Here**keene.edu
---
This e-mail is from DCHAS-L, the e-mail list of the ACS Division of Chemical Health and Safety.
For more information about the list, contact the Divisional secretary at secretary**At_Symbol_Here**dchas.org
Previous post | Top of Page | Next post